Skip to content
Monday, October 12, 2026
Explore luxury travel insights, destination guides, and exc…

Might Different Countries Follow Australia's Example in Banning Social Platforms for Youth Under Sixteen?

The nation's controversial move to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are observing closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising number of countries are considering comparable restrictions.

  • The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that phones and apps are "stealing our kids' childhood". A law is expected to be passed in the coming year.
  • Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "influence of the AI".
  • Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential tools in reserve".
  • In Spain, the prime minister has called on the legislature to pass a bill lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
  • In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
  • The administration in The Dutch government has recommended families to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a advisory statement calling for a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is given. While it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the move does not create binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a good foundation," said a leading parliamentarian supporting the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the administration has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Earlier, support grew behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration pledged to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. One foundation established by the family of a girl who died after being exposed to disturbing online content argues that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to build products and services that are secure and fit for children," said a prominent peer.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, action is primarily unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

  • Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
  • Florida has signed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
  • Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional access needing a guardian's okay.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted laws requiring guardian approval for minors to create social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from some politicians to copy Australia's path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Beyond these regions, other countries are likewise taking action.

  • Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
  • Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, global bodies take a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The organization notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve user protection.

As this international debate continues, the steps of the Australian government and its followers indicate that governments internationally are less and less content to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.

By

Teresa Crawford

A seasoned travel writer with over a decade of experience exploring luxury destinations worldwide, sharing insider tips and cultural insights.

Grand Palace Express

Type to search articles.